Constitutional & Writ Matters

Constitutional and writ matters involve the enforcement of fundamental rights and challenges to actions of the State or public authorities, typically brought before the High Court under Article 226 or the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution. Chambers of Advocate Yash Yadav advises clients on the availability and drafting of such remedies.

We assist with petitions challenging administrative action, seeking mandamus for performance of public duties, and other constitutional remedies, presenting the legal and factual grounds necessary to invoke the writ jurisdiction of the appropriate court.

Enforcing your constitutional rights

Writ jurisdiction offers an important remedy against arbitrary or unlawful action by the State, and careful drafting is essential to invoking it effectively.

From challenging administrative action to seeking constitutional remedies, we provide strategic legal representation at every stage.

Writ petitions

We draft and file writ petitions seeking appropriate relief, including certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition, depending on the nature of the grievance.
Court Room

Challenging administrative action

We advise clients on challenging orders or decisions of government departments and public authorities that are arbitrary or contrary to law.

Understanding Writ Jurisdiction

Writ remedies are discretionary and subject to specific legal requirements, which we help clients understand before proceeding.

Types of writs

Writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, and quo warranto each serve a distinct purpose in constitutional remedies.

Maintainability

We assess whether a writ petition is maintainable on the facts presented, including the availability of alternate remedies.

A precise, rights-focused approach

We ensure that constitutional petitions are grounded in a clear factual record and precisely framed legal questions to support the relief sought.

Answers to your legal questions

Frequently asked questions about constitutional and writ matters.

A writ petition may be filed where fundamental rights are violated or where a public authority acts arbitrarily or fails to perform a legal duty.

Article 32 allows petitions directly before the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights, while Article 226 grants the High Court broader writ jurisdiction.

Yes, government orders that are arbitrary, unlawful, or violative of fundamental rights can be challenged through an appropriate writ petition.

Mandamus is a writ directing a public authority to perform a duty it is legally obligated to perform but has failed to do.

There is no fixed limitation period, though courts expect petitions to be filed without undue and unexplained delay.

Disclaimer

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are prohibited from soliciting work or advertising. By accessing this website of Chambers of Advocate Yash Yadav, you acknowledge and confirm that: